RAS Energy, Mechanics & ControlАвтоматика и телемеханика Automation and Remote Control

  • ISSN (Print) 0005-2310
  • ISSN (Online) 2413-9777

Comparison of Distribution Procedures in Blended Finance

PII
10.31857/S0005231023120097-1
DOI
10.31857/S0005231023120097
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 12
Pages
106-119
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the blended (joint) finance mechanism of a megaproject consisting of several projects. One part of the megaproject budget comes from the megaproject manager and the other part from project contractors. When distributing this budget, the megaproject manager considers information about the amount of the contractor’s internal funds allocated to project implementation. Project contractors seek to get more funds from the megaproject manager; in turn, the megaproject manager is interested in attracting more funds from project contractors. To achieve this goal, the megaproject manager applies different procedures to distribute the budget. Project contractors use the information reported to the megaproject manager to increase the funds allocated to them. Straight and reverse priority distribution procedures in the blended finance mechanism are analyzed. A distribution procedure is determined that stimulates project contractors to allocate more of their internal funds to the project in a Nash equilibrium.
Keywords
смешанное финансирование прямые приоритеты обратные приоритеты плановая прибыль фактическая прибыль
Date of publication
15.12.2023
Year of publication
2023
Number of purchasers
0
Views
8

References

  1. 1. Бурков В.Н., Новиков Д.А. Как управлять проектами. М.: Синтег, 1997.
  2. 2. Новиков Д.А., Пузырев С.А., Хорохордина Н.В. Механизмы смешанного финансирования // Системы управления и информационные технологии. 2009. № 2 (20). С. 71-72.
  3. 3. Бурков В.Н., Буркова И.В., Губко М.В. и др. Механизмы управления: Мультифункциональное учебное пособие; под ред. Д.А. Новикова. Изд. 2-е переработанное и доп. М.: ЛЕНАНД, 2013.
  4. 4. Иващенко А.А., Колобов Д.В., Новиков Д.А. Механизмы финансирования инновационного развития фирмы. М.: ИПУ РАН, 2005.
  5. 5. Бурков В.Н. Основы математической теории активных систем. М.: Наука, 1977.
  6. 6. Бурков В.Н., Коргин Н.А., Новиков Д.А. Введение в теорию управления организационными системами: учебник; под ред. Д.А. Новикова. М.: Книжный дом "ЛИБРОКОМ", 2009.
  7. 7. Habbel V., Jackson E., Orth M. et al. Evaluating blended finance instruments and mechanisms: Approaches and methods // OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers, Paris, No 101, OECD Publishing, 2021, 65 p.
  8. 8. Andersen W.O., Basile I., Gotz G. et al. Blended Finance Evaluation: Governance and Methodological Challenges, OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers, Paris, 2019, No 51, OECD Publishing, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/4c1fc76e-en
  9. 9. Javier Pereira. Blended Finance: What is it, how it works and how it is used // Oxfam International, Feb. 13 2017, https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/blendedfinance-what-it-how-it-works-and-how-it-used.
  10. 10. Chainz Christina, Hendrik Hakenes. The politician and his banker - How to efficiently grant state aid // Journal of Public Economics. 2012. V. 96. P. 218-225.
  11. 11. Chen J. Risk-Adjusted Return, Investopedia, Dec. 20 2018, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/riskadjustedreturn.asp.
  12. 12. Бурков В.Н., Щепкин А.В. Противозатратные механизмы ценообразования при ограничении на сумму цен // Проблемы управления. 2021. № 3. С. 42-49.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library